Friday, December 11, 2009

Gateway Fx X-fi Motherboard

LA CARTA DEI CENTO PER IL LIBERO WI-FI


by Guido Scorza, Sergio Maistrello e Raffaele Bianco
http://gilioli.blogautore.espresso.repubblica.it/2009/11/26/la-carta-dei-cento-per-il-libero-wi-fi/

On 31 December 2009 in expiration of certain provisions of the so-called Pisanu decree ("Urgent measures to combat international terrorism") to subject the granting of access to the Internet in premises in a number of obligations such as requiring a special license from the Commissioner.

The same decree also requires all operators of public houses that offer access to Internet users through the identification of the identity document.

These rules were introduced by decree a few days after the attentati terroristici di Londra del luglio 2005, senza alcuna analisi d’impatto economico-sociale e senza discussione pubblica. Doveva essere provvisoria, ed è infatti già scaduta due volte (fine 2007 e fine 2008) ma è stata due volte prorogata.

Si tratta di norme che non hanno alcun corrispettivo in nessun Paese democratico; nemmeno il Patriot Act USA, approvato dopo l’11 settembre 2001, prevede l’identificazione di chi si connette a Internet da una postazione pubblica.

Tra gli effetti di queste norme, ce n’è uno in particolare: il freno alla diffusione di Internet via Wi-Fi, cioè senza fili. Gli oneri causati dall’obbligo di identificare i fruitori del servizio sono infatti create a huge disincentive to open wireless networks.

no coincidence that Italy has 4.806 WiFi access while in France there are five times more.

This law has dealt a blow to the growth potential of technology and culture of a country which is already lagging behind in all indices of international Internet connectivity.

Worldwide Network opens more and more, thanks to technology and wireless access points to the many shared freely by individuals, institutions and public spaces: in Italy, however, we imposed artificial locks and procedures, in breach of its immediacy and effectiveness expensive and also from the point of view. This policy

in fact represents a limitation to the right of citizens to access the Net and a hindrance to growth civilized, democratic, scientific and economic situation of our country.

Therefore, in view of the new deadline of December 31, we ask the government and parliament not to extend the effectiveness of the provisions of the Pisanu decree to expire and to repeal the provision on the obligation to identify the users thus helping to promote the spread of the wireless network for everyone.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

How I Do Get Rid Of My Blocked Nose Voice

Shqipëria: Dita e Flamurit, 28 Nentori

by Mr.G and Lady Eagle, 28 Nëntori 2009
Nëntori 28, and Flamurit fingers, toes kur 94 vjet I think, you populli Shqiptar nga gjitha trevat realizoi ngjarjen e shumepritur prej gati pese shkeuj, shpalljen e pavaresise. Heroi i Popullit, plaku i mencur dhe politikani i shquar i poppullit shqiptar ngriti flamurin e kuq me shkaben dykrenare, ne Vloren heroike.

Flamuri kuq e zi, i trasheguar nga Heroi Kombetar, princi Gjergj Kastrioti (Skenderbeu), bashkoi ne shekuj zemrat e te gjithe shqiptareve ne nje ideal te perbashket, liria e popullit shqiptar dhe krijimi i njje shteti demokratik te pavarur. Ky ideal i simbolizuar me flamurin kombetar, mbajti te ngrohta zemrat e shqiptareve dhe i dha atij force per te perballuar cdo armik qe cenonte lirine e tij.

"Per rreth flamurit te bashkuar - me nje deshire me nje qellim " kendohet ne hymnin kombetar

Nation and the national flag, symbol of survival notions that the Albanian people for centuries, that inspired the big sacrifices and heroizma of the best sons of the Albanian people to overcome the Turkish hordes time five centuries ago and the Nazi-Fascist occupation during World War II world. Battles for freedom of the people, not reshten after the declaration of independence. They were raised against oppression and social injustice zogist regime, against poverty and the right working condition in which the country had led to the self-proclaimed king. The Albanian people knelt there's no defeats and guzim lirve opposed the denial of human rights by communist dictatorship which we supposedly "on behalf of the people" and persecuted inkriminoi so inhuman thousands te pafajshem.

Sot perkujtojme dhe i perulemi me respekt Flamurit Kombetar. Kjo dite festohet ne Shqiperi, ne Kosove ne Maqedoni, ne Mal te Zi e ne te gjitha viset e banuara nga diaspora shqiptare. Shqiptaret kudo jetojne e punojne jane krenare per prejardhjen e tyre e vazhdojne te kultivojne gjuhen, kulturen, traditat duke mbajtur te gjalle ndjenjen e atdhedashurise e te lirise si idealet me te cmuara.

Perkujtimi i dites se Flamurit nuk eshte vetem dite feste e nderimi per rilindasit e kombit shqiptar, per themeluesit e shtetit te pare shqiptar, per te renet ne luften heroike nacional clirimtare, per te renet ne te gjitha luftrat kunder regjimeve persekutuese e diktatoriale, por ajo pa asnje dyshim eshte edhe dite rflektimi e vleresimi per gjendjen e sotme te vendit e te popullit tone.

Kriza politike dhe varferia ekonomike po thellohen cdo dite e me shume. Korupsioni prej vitesh ka kapur shtetin, institucionet e pavarura dhe nje pjese te medias. Premtimet elektorale mashtruese te disa politikaneve, abuzimi me pushtetin duke perdorur shtetin si instrument pasurimi vetjak ne kuriz te popullit, apatia dhe mos veprimi ne sistemin e drejtesise, korupsioni dhe paftesia ne sistemin aresimor, abuzimi i pa kufi ne sistemin ekonomik shteteror, jane kthyer ne rutine e ne nje “moral” qe te garanton suksesin. Pasi shkelet ligji, kerkesa per venien ne vend te drejtesise, mohoet ne menyre flagrante gjoja ne emer te “ligjit”. Media limitohet, goditet, poshterohet dhe komandohet. All these occur under a government where ONE pyramid on top of the pyramid controls and maintains direct links up with its base, which as you would if it is very close. It is without doubt an attempt to restore a dictatorial regime.

But disaster for the people is when:

1. The opposition was protesting against the attack with libel by "power" and boycott it, with all that is in principle a legitimate democratic instrument, which challenged internationally eyes shut before the risk of dictatorship that is being restored and galloping corruption of some politicians or statesmen.

2. Investgon Rihet critical journalism on corruption and some journalist or other media instead of punishment justification of violence directly or indirectly, openly or by their silence perpetrator.

3. Popular protest against the peaceful and democratic state with ministers koruptur still under investigation, some "opinioniste" so contemptuous call "crowd" that should not be considered.

4. Premier usurper speaking from pulpit of parliament (democratic institutions), as dictator threatens Almighty using ordinary language with the banal of the road, to offend not only the special mention names but all the Albanian democratic society, and his deputy, his ministers applaud as is ordinary in support of any dictator or kapomafie.

5. They are the rulers of those MP coming to power in contested elections for the theft of fraud, exercise the power to prevent transparency which legitimizes or so unearth definitive or theft and violations of basic freedoms of a democratic society - expressed by free vote.

6. Compiled laws favoring selective effects only for the prime minister, his family and a close race around him.

7. A large extent on citizens, in the sense of concrete practical lacks vital food, water lacks, lacks energy, lacks health service, lack of education, lack work, where the institution lacks the resolve his troubles because it is corrupt to the extent of application as the measure of corruption determined by proximity to "ONE".

8. Gaps and needs for survival used in the most inhuman way to buy votes against the current minimum remuneration.

9. Statesmen steal on behalf of large projects and the popular voice is not heard prosecution.

10. Statesmen directly or indirectly kill the innocent population and ignored the popular charges or sinks with all kinds of makjiavelizma, ca ca ee administrative law, applied again in order koruptive, and court and prosecution silent disability or has fallen prey to dirty shopping.

11. Legitimate aspirations of freedom of movement and of European integration, are in the hands of individuals and representatives of international institutions, te cilet udhehiqen jo nga principe demokratike por nga perkatesia klanore e partiake e tyre si individe, te cilet pranojne te lobojne e te mbeshtesin individe ose grupime klanore shqiptare qe po e cojne vendin drejt shkaterimit, drejt nje neodiktature.

12. Thirjet e pushtetareve me kryeministrin ne krye, sjellja e mediave qe per aresye koruptive i bindet kryeministrit, komentet e pseudo opinionisteve qe i lepihen atij, nuk bejne gje tjeter vecse propogandojne te ndajne popullin shqiptar ne dy grupime kunder njeri tjetrit.

Por populli shqiptar ndergjegjesohet cdo dite e me shume. Ai, asnje here nuk eshte gjunjezuar e nuk eshte mposhtur nga diktaturat apo nga regjime te ngjashme para apo pas viteve '90. Nuk eshte dorezuar as para tallazeve qe secretly and unfairly, some foreign countries chancellor have clashed in dryshme moments of history, for the purposes of evil. Resistance of the Albanian people has been supported and continues to be supported by many countries sincere friends. Supported by all international democratic institutions, of all Western democracies, and by many organizations that vigjelojne demokratikes democratic developments on the protection of human rights.

national consciousness of the Albanian people, universal ideals for freedom and democracy remain non-negotiable aspirations that form at the same time its historical identity and the identity of the future of his large family of democratic Europe. Albanians as a virtue of the identity National entire Albanian people who want to live in freedom and democracy, and has remained consistently above the regional divisions, religious, political and every other kind anyone wants to realize the artificial. Therefore Flag Day is not a celebration but simultaneously Memorial is also a day commitment to continue the resistance and fight, with every democratic means, against neodiktatures, against the usurpation of state from organized crime and corruption, to strengthen the rule of law, the state of democratic freedoms and human rights.

dictatorship
Down Flag Day
Viva Viva Albanian freedom-loving people

Answering Machine Messages Garbled

Albania: Giornata della Bandiera, 28 Novembre


by Mr.G and Lady Eagle, November 28, 2009
November 28, Flag Day, the day 94 years ago, the Albanian people has made the event much anticipated by many centuries, the cry of independence. The hero of the People, Isamil Qemali, wise and supporter of the independence of Albania, has raised the red flag with the eagle with two heads in heroic Vlora.

The red-black flag, National inherited by the hero, the Prince of Krujë, Gjergj Kastriot Skenderbeu, has united the hearts of all Albanians with a common ideal of freedom of the Albanian people and the creation of an independent state. The nation symbolized by the flag, has warmed the hearts of the Albanians and gave them strength to face any enemy that might threaten it.

"United around the flag with only one desire and goal," we sing in our anthem.

The Nation and the Flag, symbol of the survival of the Albanian people for centuries, have inspired heroic acts and sacrifices required of the best sons of the Mother of Albania to defeat the Turks and the fight against the Nazi-Fascist occupation during the Second World War . The struggle for freedom did not stop after the proclamation of independence in 1912. Have awakened against the pressure and the injustices of the regime of King Zog, poverty and violations of workers' rights, conditions have occurred due to the misrule of the self-proclaimed king. The Albanian people have never knelt, with courage and determination has also fought against the denial of freedom and human rights during the repressive communist dictatorship of Enver Hoxha, which "in the name of the people" have persecuted, prosecuted and eventually eliminated thousands of people in a barbaric manner.

Today we remember with respect and we bow down in front of the National Flag. This memorable day is celebrated in Albania, Kosova, Macedonia, Montenegro and in all countries where the Albanian diaspora living fair. Yes, proud, because the Albanians living working with pride of his home and continue the tradition tend to cultivate a living language, culture, love of country and freedom, considering them as inalienable ideals.

The commemoration of Flag Day is not just a day of celebration and respect for the rebirth of the nation to the founders of the original Albanian State, for the fallen during the heroic war of national liberation, for the fallen of all the wars against the dictatorial regimes, but no doubt is also a day of reflection and assessment of current conditions in the country and our people. We really left behind the wars and struggles for independence?

The economic crisis and poverty are becoming stronger. Corruption has eroded the rule, the highest public institutions and even the media. The deceptive campaign promises of some politicians, abuse of power by using the state as an instrument of personal wealth at the expense of the people, the apathy and the failure of the legal system, corruption and inadequacy in the training system, abuse infinite state of the economy by the powerful has now turned into a routine with a basic "ethics" that ensures the success of only a few. The media are limited, hit, humiliated and criticized. All this happens in a government where the summit pyramid controls all the reins of the country. And 'no doubt an attempt to impose a system of dictatorship.

-Abuses of power to the people is when:

1. The opposition legitimate protest in a democratic way, but is attacked with false accusations by the government and is ostracized by the West. Developed countries turn a blind eye in front of the real risk of a birth of a dictatorial government and remain silent about the corruption that undermines the system and politicians.

2. Investigative journalist that public funds and corruption of the powerful politicians blacks is brutally attacked, journalists and government media rather than condemning the violence, criticizing the incident or, worse still justify the beating.

3. Some commentators call "mass" not to be taken into account, the peaceful and democratic popular demonstration against the corrupt government formed ministers under investigation.

4. Prime Minister Sali Berisha usurper, seized the parliament, a democratic institution, to launch its threat as a dictator, using foul language and inappropriate to offend the names of the individuals, embarrassing the entire Albanian people to the world, and his ministers and pro-government supporters applaud instead as it does with every dictator and boss.

5. Those ministers and deputies, the government finished with controversial elections, manipulators, usurpers of power, continue to deny transparency doubts about the elections leaving both devoid of electoral fraud and violence with the freedom of an elementary democratic people to have a legitimate government freely chosen.

6. Laws are created for the Prime Minister, his family and a small clan, looks like a pyramid hierarchical mafia-type (ad personam laws that remind us of someone here in Italy).

7. For a large part of the Albanian people lack basic necessities like water, electricity, health services, education, jobs, social services, safeguard an institution that lacks the most vulnerable, the only thing now is the growing corruption has reached appalling levels.

8. Trading of electoral votes are charged by looters taking advantage of the desperate need for survival in exchange for poor service and random goods.

9. The robbery was in the name of big projects never made and the suffering of the people's voice is not heard

10. The state kills people, directly or indirectly, the accusations made against the government but are suppressed or denigrated sometimes Machiavellian methods with administrative and sometimes legislative, that are imposed by powerful through corruption, this is when prosecutors and courts remain in silence because they probably finished the payroll.

11. The proclamations of the government, the behaviors of some corrupt media that support the prime minister, opinion flunky, do nothing but spread government propaganda with the aim to split and weaken the Albanian people.

But the people become aware day by day. He never humiliated or kneeling in front of any dictatorial regime, and neither before nor after the 90s. The stability of the Albanian people was and still is supported by many foreign countries who show sincere friends. This solid foundation of the Albanian people is reinforced by all international institutions, the West and many democratic organizations that oversee the development of democracy and human rights defenders.

The national consciousness of the Albanian people, the universal ideals for democracy and freedom, aspirations remain non-negotiable, it was the historical identity of the past and future in the great European family. "Shqiptaria" being Albanian, is a virtue of the national identity of a people who want to live in freedom and democracy, which has remained intact and above the separation of regional, religious, political or any other division that some want to create quite artificial.

why Flag Day is not just a day of commemoration but also very active for the stability and the fight, by any means democracy, against neo-dictatorship, against the usurpation of the state at the hands of organized crime and corruption, and for the rule of law, legality and freedom. Viva la

Flag Day!
Long live the Albanian people!

Thursday, November 19, 2009

How Many Panadols Does It Take To Die

Il Massacro di Wia - The Wia Massacre


Massacre Wia
Italino version of NT
Another reprehensible mass killing was the massacre of WIA. The 2006 report of the Department of State, "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices" reports that 'June 10 [2005] military personnel killed 161 young people, who tried to flee the Wia military camp'. No action was taken against military personnel who shot and killed 161 young people. The victims were enrolled in the NMSP (National Military Service Programme), ended up in prison in detention for several reasons.
The massacre was intended to terrorize others, lest you decide to leave the country 'illegally' or not abscond once ended up in detention. The military camp of WIA was the same place where, in 2001, about 2,000 college students were arbitrarily detained for several weeks after having protested against the summer job, an unpopular government policy. During detention, two university students, and Yemen Yirga Yosief Tekie, have died because of harsh living conditions in the field.


The Massacre Wia

by Daniel
reprehensible Another mass killing Wia Was The Massacre. Quoting the US Department of State, in its 2006 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices reported that ‘on June 10 [2005] military personnel shot and killed 161 youths at Wia Military Camp who were trying to escape.’ No action was taken against military personnel who shot and killed the 161 youths. The victims were conscripts of the NMSP (National Military Service Programme), who were being kept in the detention camp for several reasons.
The massacre was meant to terrorise other conscripts, lest they decide to leave the country ‘illegally’ or escape once they were in detention. Wia Military Camp was the same place where, in 2001, some 2000 university students were arbitrarily detained for several weeks after protesting against the unpopular government policy of summer work. During the detention, two university students, and Yemane Tekie Yirga Yosief, died as a result of the harsh living conditions in the camp.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Hutch Trick Bike For Sale

Il Massacro di Mai Habar - The Mai Habar Massacre


Massacre Mai Habar
Italino version of NT

The main cause of repression in Eritrea is the excessive concentration of power within the executive branch of government. The brutal suppression of the revolt of disabled veterans of war was one of the first demonstrations of this sad development: event that happened back in July 11, 1994, known as the Mai Habar Massacre. In this episode, an unknown number of protesters were killed, allegedly on the direct order of President of the State. During the second anniversary of the massacre Mai Habar, the official bulletin of EFL-RC (Eritrean Liberation Front-Revolutionary Council) complained that on that fateful day, war invalids were killed only for peacefully protesting and then asked firmly a meeting with the President of the State, which stubbornly refused to meet them.

Other victims associated with the massacre Mai Habar are about 25 disabled war veterans, who were immediately arrested under the pretext of inciting to rebellion. Remained detention without trial for several years. The same source cited the words of the president, referring to invalids of war says ' spoiled brats'. The president attributed the cause of the accident alleged irresponsible acts of the protesters themselves.


The Massacre Mai Habar
by Daniel
Concentration of excessive power within the executive branch of government has Been the major causes of repression in Eritrea. One of the Earliest Manifestations of this sad development Was the brutal repression of the mutiny of disabled war veterans on 11 July 1994 , Known as the Mai Habar Massacre. In this incident, an unknown number of protestors were shot dead, allegedly on direct orders from the state president. During the second anniversary of the Mai Habar Massacre , the official newsletter of the EFL-RC (Eritrean Liberation Front-Revolutionary Council) lamented that on that fateful day the disabled war veterans were killed simply for peacefully protesting and firmly demanding to meet the state president, who obstinately refused to meet them.

Other victims associated with the Mai Habar Massacre are some 25 disabled war veterans , who were immediately arrested on the pretext of instigating rebellion. They remained in detention without trial for several years. The same source has quoted the state president as referring to the disabled war veterans as ‘ spoilt brats .’ The president has also blamed the incident on alleged irresponsible acts of the protestors themselves.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Copytodvd-blu-ray Disc

Yemen summons Eritrean ambassador for alleged arms supply to rebels


www.chinaview.cn 2009-11-10
Y emeni Foreign Minister Tuesday summoned Eritrean ambassador to Yemen following alleged tips that Eritrea provides weapons to anti-government rebels in Yemen, a diplomat at the Yemeni Foreign Ministry said.

"The Ministry got evidence and valuable information that Eritrea facilitates conveying weapons through its coastlines -- provided from a foreign country -- to the Zaidi rebels in northern Yemen," the diplomat told Xinhua by phone on condition of anonymity.

He said coastguards of Yemen often intercepted boats full of concealed weapons sailing from an Eritrean coastal city to Medi port adjacent to bastions of Zaidi rebels, named Houthis after their slain leader's clan.

"Rebels go to Eritrea as Yemeni fishermen in disguise to avoid being intercepted by the Yemeni coast guards, and come back with their boat full of concealed weapons," said the diplomat, adding "at night they docked at Medi and unloaded the weapons to vehicles awaited at some specific places."

The diplomat hinted at the possibility of using Eritrean soil as a base by Iran, but providing no further details.

Sanaa has often said that Iran is backing Shiite rebels in Yemen, an accusation which Iran has always denied.

Eritrea is situated in the Horn of Africa, off Yemeni northern coastline and Saudi city of Jizan on the Red Sea, where high-level skirmishes between Yemeni rebels and Saudi military forces have erupted after anti-government rebels crossed into the Saudi soil of Jizan.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Body Muscle Percentage Chart

Gulag degli studenti eritrei

by N.T. 30 settembre 2009
Era la metà del mese di luglio e il mondo aspettava il summit del G8 a genova. Televisioni sintonizzate sulla riunione dei governanti dei maggiori paesi industrializzati. I No-Global manifestano insieme alle associazioni pacifist. Police, Carabinieri and Guardia di Finanza in riot gear. Army on alert. The tessione begins to mount, the information also gives voice to the protesters. The news do not talk about anything else. Urban warfare, Black Block, scuffles and positions of the agents. All seem to lose all sense of reality. The world is appalled before the killing of Carlo Giuliani, are shown the video of that unfortunate incident. The beating of demonstrators avviente after the Diaz school and in the streets, is transmitted as a prolonged pain. Stop the events that follow one another in the West and turn our attention to Eritrea.

In those days even in those times there were ongoing demonstrations Asmara University students. Why Eritrean students were protesting? Because these disagreements to their government in an African country? E 'are known to students around the world during the summer holidays are less committed because of the holidays. In Eritrea, however during the summer each student at any level required to participate in the work (called in the Tigrinya MAATOT) promoted by the dictatorship. There's even a summer program for political proselytizing of young western Eritrean origin. Here is an example program in 2008; 2 days of special celebration dedicated to the youth of Canada and the United States: [ http://na.nueys.org/flyer/Guideline% 20for% 20Participation.pdf ]
Virtually
colonies of boys are sent to work in villages (and villages) located in remote areas. In almost 18 years of administrative management of the scheme Afewerky, almost every summer, with a few exceptions, all students were forced to hard labor in the Gulag Eritreans. Child labor exploitation, violation of freedom of movement and freedom, forced labor, slavery, physical punishment, etc. ... etc. ... The violations will not count.
course, the representatives of the university after years of silence patient manifested on behalf of all students, protested against this practice of exploitation, in opposition to the regime firmly. They had never done, on that occasion The repression was brutal. From that moment on, the history of the Eritrean government is moving towards a point of no return full of horrors.

You can ask around, and Western diplomats to authorities, the event of university students, then branded as a coup attempt against the government. According to this charge students were deported to detention camps military. A witness describes in detail what has happened in that time university students to asmara [ http://www.awate.com/portal/content/view/4025/6/ ]

This history of repression mass ends for many university students November 7, 2001 after months of torture and agonies, with at least two deaths among students (Yirga Yosief and Yemane Tekie -14 August 2001 - August 19, 2001). The atrocities have been consumed in various prison camps, of which only the military has Wia convolto 2000 students arbitrarily detained. The dismantling and destruction of university education was only beginning. Here's a post reflection on why the closure of the University of Asmara:
[ http://admasinexile.blogspot.com/2008/03/why-demolishing-sole-university-in.html ]

Kates Playground The Early Days

Scambio epistolare con un giornalista

by NT September 30, 2009

L a bad story of the children of Petros Solomon is important to us, as we are care about the Eritrean civilians who have no voice to cry out their pain.
[ http://www.awate.com/portal/content/view/5233/3/ ]
[ http://www.awate.com/portal/content/view/5216/3/ ]

[ http://espresso.repubblica.it/dettaglio/desaparecidos-d-africa/2111093 ]

When I informed many of my fellow students for the disappearance of Asmara (capture) of the children, some have suggested that I not to endanger the flight of children of Petros, others have asked me if I was some opposition to the game and kept asking me why I was interested in these guys.

Despite myself, the bad news I have had during the period of maturity exam will take place in Italy that coincides with that of Italian schools abroad. The children of Petros had disappeared the day before the start of the examination and no one could identify where they were finished. Not even phone calls to her aunt, who lived with the boys, were able to resolve the issue.

Probably the reputation of the parents of these children and the failure to present the final exam, which could not be put off, disturbed professors and students. There was (still is) a suspicion that members of their Eritreans have organized the kidnapping and then fabricated the story of the escape. The suspicion arises, because the boys were quite good to merit scholarships abroad. In two years they could conclude the duties of citizens and Eritreans could hope to leave the country to study abroad.

I personally feel involved in this story only because they followed the footprints where I passed. They attended the same school and even the same teachers. Then the comments of some, who wondered why the continue to tell only the story of the children of Petros, may be of questionable validity.

I thought that perhaps we need to "inform" the public is Italian and the Italo-Eritrean different attrocità Iseyas Afewerky made by the scheme. Indeed instead of the term "information" would use "remind" poichè molti sono a conoscienza dei fatti e ma hanno la memoria corta.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

How Long Does Ring Worm Take To Heal

MILITARIZED Diplomacy: foreign policy ERITREA between continuity and discontinuity (Last Part)

Considerazioni Conclusive

Volendo mettere in luce alcuni elementi caratterizzanti la politica estera eritrea, una premessa è d’obbligo. Infatti, le posizioni prese dal paese in diplomazia non possono che rispecchiare la necessità di preservare e di rafforzare la propria identità di nuovo attore della comunità internazionale e regionale. Il concetto di sovranità nel Corno d’Africa è, storicamente, un valore molto sentito, e sulla cui base sono state spesso combattute guerre drammaticamente sanguinarie (come quella dell’Ogaden del 1977-78 tra Etiopia e Somalia e quella of the 1998-2000 border between Eritrea and Ethiopia). In addition, one of the effects of the last war of 1998-2000 is certainly represented by the redefinition of membership of "national" of both contenders. The thirty years' war of national liberation dell'EPLF, in fact, were largely perceived as something "inside" Ethiopia. The latest conflict, however, it is a war between two sovereign countries, seems to have had a successful round. In this case, it is Eritrea "other" against which (and why) the Ethiopian national identity was (re) defined. This observation seems rather true when one considers that, following the victory of 2000, the Ethiopian Government has never tried to absorb Eritrea, or to territorial claims, with the exception of one area that was the cause of the conflict. A valid method, then, to understand the positions - sometimes unscrupulous - the Eritrean government's foreign policy is to set a reflection on a longue durée approach, identifying more than other elements of continuity that characterized the international relations Eritreans, by struggle for national liberation to the country's entry into the international community. Dell'EPLF military victory against the Ethiopian army, as we have seen, it certainly served - as well as to shape and reinforce a sense of Eritrean national unity - as a factor in the radicalization of foreign policy.

The efficient military organization experienced during the years of guerrilla antietiopica was almost entirely transferred to the frameworks and governance structures of post-independence period, thus also the militarization of the state administrative structure. Historically, problems with the sovereignty of the country (from the deposition of the federal structure by Haile Selassie in 1963, the long liberation war which ended only in 1991, up to last cross-border conflict with Ethiopia's 1998-2000), have ended up shaping diplomacy "traditionally aggressive, both in language, both in bilateral and multilateral regional relations.

Eritrea, moreover, is also a "State border". This concept, the role and the geographical and political position of the country, has always been characterized by a certain ambivalence. In other words, it seems to be necessary both in the physical sense (Eritrea has among its neighbors really important state actors such as Ethiopia and Sudan, but it is also located in a strategic Red Sea, making it a ring of meeting with the mainland Arabic) sia in senso ideologico (il popolo eritreo ha vissuto per anni in opposizione alla dominazione di un “centro” rappresentato dalla realtà imperiale etiopica, e ancora oggi la propaganda del governo di Asmara sembra essere tutta indirizzata a enfatizzare una possibile minaccia esterna e a preservare i confini raggiunti durante gli anni di lotta di liberazione).

Per riassumere, quindi, “frontiera” e “militarizzazione” sembrano essere i punti cardinali di una politica estera, quella di Asmara, impostata quasi su una conservazione ossessiva della propria identità di stato indipendente. Ogni eritreo, infatti, vive costantemente in uno stato di allerta e immerso in una propaganda che enfatizza il imminent danger of invasion. It is also why, historically, the Eritrean foreign policy can be described almost as a Militarized diplomacy. In addition, although difficult to envisage redevelopment in the short term - primarily due to continued disagreements with Ethiopia - it is clear that only a "demilitarization" and "demobilization", not only of military equipment, but also of the same foreign policy of the country , finally I can include the risks of a new escalation of violence in the Horn of Africa. It is true that the two challenges go hand in hand, and that in the absence of a reduction of the soul that distinguishes today's militarist government Afwerki, will be difficult to have the same effect in foreign policy.

The border war of 1998-2000 and the demarcation of the Eritrean-Ethiopian border are still an open wound in complex regional chessboard. But the international community's response does not appear to have been adapted to the prerogatives of the complicated state of relations between the two contenders, causing the one hand the emergence of regional hegemonic ambitions, while the other - in addition to a strong sense of distrust of actors International mediation - a dangerous radicalization in foreign policy is domestic. The failure of the boundary - and therefore also of the Algiers Agreements - Is mainly in the fact that he left to "politicize" an issue deliberately kept - at least initially - in a sphere purely "technocratic". The Algiers Agreements in fact (in the proposal made by the U.S. and Rwanda) have been conducted primarily within a sphere technique, leaving largely unanswered the substantive policy issues. These are summarized in at least three points: 1) The principle of conservation of colonial borders in sub-Saharan Africa as set out by the then Organization of African Unity (OAU) during the Cairo Summit of 1964. The Boundary Commission - in order not to derogate from that principle - could not act ex aequo et bono, according only to treaties concluded during the colonial period between Italy and Ethiopia. 2) Ethiopia has won the last military confrontation of 1998-2000. It therefore seems clear that the prospect of passing the village of Badme to Eritrea in the country has triggered some alarm bells, and the fear of a "mutilated victory" achieved with enormous human and economic disputes. 3) The Eritrea, from its side, was certainly the moral winner, as well as military, the war of national liberation, achieved through enormous sacrifices, and in almost complete international isolation. A clash between two winners then? Perhaps, but the problem does not seem be the border itself.

addition, the tools used to contain a new escalation of the conflict have ended up producing the opposite effect. Given these complications, international - and especially regional - you can certainly see how the language used in diplomacy by both countries - although both oriented toward the head-on collision - are profoundly different and temperamentally. While the Zenawi government is more willing to diplomacy and less militaristic (do not forget that Ethiopia has rejected the first decisions of the Boundary Commission, as well as militarily invading Somalia, citing as main motivation the need to destroy the jihadist movements in the country and supported, according to Addis Ababa, Eritrea), Afwerki seems at least to most harsh and unscrupulous. This feature is likely to slide Eritrea in complete international isolation. In fact, there are a few to consider in Asmara as a major source of instability in the Horn of Africa, to become - according to the U.S. government - a real "rogue state", almost like Iran and Korea North.

It is true that a less "global" and more "regional" by the international community - Washington in testa – avrebbe certamente evitato una tale degenerazione politica. Ma del resto è anche piuttosto risaputo che – con una brevissima eccezione durante l’ultimo periodo di amministrazione Carter – il Corno d’Africa è stato sempre inserito all’interno di ampie strategie geopolitiche, che poco o nulla avevano a che fare con dinamiche e priorità politiche più locali, facendone al contempo una delle aree più contese dell’Africa sub-sahariana, ma anche una delle meno “comprese”.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Substitute Coconut Oil Baking

Albania: the gag Information

by Lady Eagle in collaborazione con Michele. 5/11/2009
Sono passati ormai quasi vent'anni dalla caduta of the Berlin Wall and especially cadauto Communist regime in Albania . The wind of change has brought with it suffering, social inequality and consequently exodus of generations. Fathers and sons ingiottiti from the sea and storm, cold and heat consumed by the hope for a better future. Generations lost in the struggle for survival on the sea bed and never returned to his family.
discriminated against because recent emigrants from Albania and in the social scale, segregated and deprived of any right, upon their arrival deprived of their freedom of movement, persecuted for their religious beliefs and political thought. All violations in a land they thought best and civil. In a West where he professes freedom of the press, communication, movement, thought, expression and belief, immigrants are denied their basic rights and often subjected to smear campaigns by their own free press.
decades now 89, but the beautiful land of the Eagles went from Communist Regime a Democratic Regime , by the dictator Enver Hoxha, the dictator Sali Berisha .
Twenty years is a reasonable time for a change, but my land is still in the hands of organs " authoritarian political" and "gag information. Where the rich lord it and others suffer without a murmur. Because the speaker farà i conti con chi comanda.
A chi viola il "silenzio stampa" imposto de facto , come ha fatto una testata giornalistica di opposizione con ironia e con prove tangibili, viene applicata una sanzioni che prevede anche il divieto di pubblicazione.
Divieto di pubblicazione per 296 giorni solo per aver criticato il governo albanese, come nei peggiori regimi totalitari. Chi, se non la stampa locale deve verificare l'operato dei governanti. I capi del governo e gli amministratori stanno al vertice del paese non per comandare ma per governare . Probabilmente molti dittatori conoscono affondo la sottile differenza semantica tra governo e comando.
Mero Base, editore e fondatore del giornale banned from publication, driven by professional duty to the freedom of the press, continues with determination to recount in detail his truths informing illegally especially via the web. The publisher

Mero Base has now become a journalist who opposes the policy of Sali Berisha. The Prime Minister Berisha is a powerful man who is now at the top by a vettennio. Prime Minister from 1992 to 1997, in opposition from 1997 to 2005, became prime minister in 2005 for the second time. In the disputed election of 2009 was and continues to vicitore shall exercise its power on Albania. It 's a controversial figure in September 1998 in Tirana took part in the attempted coup against The Nano government after the murder of Azem Hajdari Democrat. But an authoritarian character
not enough to have the power of government, also wants to control the thoughts of citizens, and then click the persecution of all forms of differentiation. It professes the concept that says: "One heart, one nation." Those who have a different view from those in power are enemies of the country.
And here punctually arriving aggression towards the hands of publisher Mero Base Rezart Hush made just to intimidate. The absurd and that the hitter is respectable Rezart Taci Taci Oil President, Chairman of Klubi Sportiv Gramozi Ersek (Albanian football club), chairman of the chess league Albanian. An Albanian so rich tycoon who had the ball to buy Bologna football. Have you understood the Bologna FC 1909 , which plays in Serie A Italian. L ' 80% of the shares of Bologna's patron Rezart Shut up. The Taci Oil is a company operating in the extraction oil.
In an authoritarian state only those who have protective shadow of the dictator can be enriched at the expense of citizens. The owner Rezart Hush trusted friend of Prime Minister Sali Berisha beaten to a pulp with impunity the publisher Mero Base.
Sali Berisha preliminary PUBLICATION parole di condanna contro il gesto di aggressione ma in modo celato vigila sui propri interessi e persegue ogni forma di libertà di stampa ed espressione. In questi giorni un gruppo di giornalisti e attivisti della società civile hanno manifestato davanti all'ufficio del primo ministro per contestare la mancata azione concreta del governo albanese. Ricordo per la cronaca che l'editore Mesa Base fu brutalmente assalito al Bar Capriccio , nel centro di Tirana , quartiere Bllok . L' aggressione selvaggia da parte di Rezart Taçi e delle sue guardie del corpo è durata vari minuto interrotta forse dalla perdità di conoscenza dell'editore. There is nothing in this human wickedness there is nothing in this Albanian aggression. The country of Albania Maria Teresa is a country of love and acceptance, it must not be prey to unscrupulous businessmen.
proud to be born in the land of the Eagles, proud of the blood of a proud people, always fighting say NO to this government without dignity and without respect, I say NO to one of the dictators who are still standing, I say NO to countries before the atrocity and ask dumb voice for a people who have the right to speak, to work and live without fear.

Wedding Reception Card Wording In Spanish

Militarized Diplomacy: foreign policy ERITREA between continuity and discontinuity (Part III)

regional report

To assess the post-independence Eritrean regional reports is good to analyze links, as well as Ethiopia, also with Sudan, especially after the mid-nineties.
For then, relations between the two countries seemed to be quite tight, especially for the support of the Khartoum government provided some jihadi groups, and Eritreans - later - because of summit of Sana'a, which took place between the leaders of Ethiopia, Yemen and Sudan, which is soon to be configured as a true "diplomatic front" containment antieritreo. The meeting in Arabic, in fact, occurred in 2002 between Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir and Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, indeed a closed system of alliances (only the appearance of economic origin) in many ways hostile to Asmara, which, in turn, had contributed least to encourage. This diplomatic encirclement, in fact, the result was certainly one part of the continued war against Eritrea in Yemen for the Hanish archipelago (not completed until 1998) and the other of supporting Sudanese rebel Eastern Front, in the border region of Kassala, and the government in Khartoum had always responded with the support of the Eritrean Islamic Jihad Movement (pointed to by the apparatus of government in Asmara which more responsible for the attacks in the towns of Barentu and Tesseney May 2004).

The scenario just described has, however, suffered - particularly in the last two years - a very significant change. This was mainly the product of a reversal of Isaias on relations with Sudan and Yemen. The agreement in Asmara on 14 October 2006, which ended the armed conflict between the rebels of the Eastern Front and the Sudan government in Khartoum, was - in the complex arena of regional Horn of Africa - an undeniable victory Afwerki for diplomacy. The words of appreciation from his counterpart costs Al-Bashir at the last summit of COMESA (Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa) held in Djibouti, "the impeccable mediating role played by negotiations in Asmara and - specifically - to the availability of its president to have contributed actively to the achievement of meetings ", have helped to capitalize on the final exit from the isolation of Eritrea.
Consequently, the "Front of Sana'a" has undergone a significant downsizing, the new course the Eritrean-Sudanese relations have undoubtedly helped to accelerate.

is undeniable, however, as other factors have indirect militated in favor of Asmara. The current cooling of relations between Addis Ababa and Djibouti, for example, due to the choice of Zenawi to do the port of Djibouti is the only landlocked country - involving them working relationships for the usufruct of Port Sudan - not that a major reversal of this indirect diplomacy. The Minister of Transport and Communications of Ethiopia has recently announced it will join Port Sudan to the Ethiopian town of Moyale through a railway line in order to seriously consider the partial replacement of Djibouti (for the exponential increase in costs required Arab society by management of the port) as a preferred channel outlet on the Red Sea.
Expulsion of Djibouti from Ethiopia, Eritrea and its subsequent approach has also paved the way for dialogue with other countries in the Red Sea, as evidenced by improved relations with Yemen. In December 2004 Afwerki made the first official visit to Sana'a. The changed relationship between the two countries began with the resolution of the International Court in The Hague, following the invasion of the Hanish Islands (located at the mouth of the Red Sea) by Eritrea in 1995. The ruling gave the largest island of the archipelago (Hanish, in fact) to Yemen, while the smaller islands are divided between the contenders, evitando nuovi contrasti in merito allo sfruttamento delle risorse ittiche. Ulteriore testimonianza del rinnovato spirito di cooperazione risulta essere lo scambio di visite dell’estate del 2006 tra il presidente Isaias e la sua controparte yemenita Ali Abdullah Saleh. Durante i colloqui i due leader hanno avuto l’occasione di discutere di molti aspetti legati alle relazioni bilaterali tra i due paesi, rafforzando le prospettive di una futura cooperazione anche in campo economico.

Il riavvicinamento politico di Asmara verso vicini importanti quali Sudan e Yemen non appare pertanto essere casuale. Inoltre, la giustificazione antietiopica – almeno in questo caso – potrebbe non risultare sufficiente per coglierne totalmente le motivazioni. Non è un mistero, infatti, che Khartoum e Sana’a, oltre a rappresentare due vicini geopoliticamente importanti, sono altresì due paesi produttori di petrolio. Il Sudan soprattutto – grazie anche alla relativa stabilizzazione raggiunta nelle regioni del sud con la firma del CPA (Comprehensive Peace Agreement) del gennaio del 2005 – rappresenta il terzo maggior produttore di petrolio dell’Africa sub-sahariana, alle spalle solo di Nigeria e Angola. Isaias ne è assolutamente consapevole, ed è inoltre cosciente del fatto che il suo paese attualmente attraversa un grave stato di emergenza energetica. I tagli alle forniture elettriche in tutto il territorio eritreo, infatti, rimangono al momento molto frequenti, although the autumn of 2006 (just to coincide with the signing of agreements between the Eastern Front in Asmara and the Government of Sudan, chaired by Al-Bashir), they do not seem to extend to more capital.

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Milena Velba Three Gallery

Militarized Diplomacy: foreign policy ERITREA between continuity and discontinuity (Part II)

Asmara: identity, independence and conflicts of a state "developed"

Eritrean identity emerged mainly as opposed to reality just before the Ethiopian imperial fascist invasion of Abyssinia in 1935. According to historians, it was the product of three main factors. First, growth of an ideology of discrimination directed against the Ethiopian people subject during the Italian colonization, compared to the Eritrean people considered to be under the protective umbrella of the "civilizing". Second, the economic boom that was recorded in Italian Eritrea immediately before the invasion of Ethiopia. And third, the role of Eritrean troops Fascist invasion of Ethiopia (it is estimated that about 50,000 units of the Italian army were then made by Ascari). These three features contributed to the birth of a first "boundary" between the Italian colony and Addis Ababa, contributing considerably to the formation of Eritrea and the myth of the country as the most developed area of \u200b\u200bthe empire, a conviction rooted in this part even in the rhetoric of the liberation war.

After the Italian defeat in World War II, Eritrea was temporarily placed under British trusteeship, before the UN decided to federate to Ethiopia in 1952. Its complete annexation by Haile Selassie as the fourteenth province of the empire in 1962 unleashed the first armed resistance in the area. The Eritrean Liberation Front (ELF) began guerrilla actions in 1961, but in 1970 a small faction of the group is separated from the original line, then taking the name - in 1975 - the Eritrean People's Liberation Front (EPLF). The tension tra l’ELF e l’EPLF si concluse solo nel 1982, quando l’ELF fu sconfitto dall’EPLF, che rimase così l’unico movimento di contrapposizione al regime di Menghistu, che nel frattempo aveva destituito tramite un colpo di stato militare l’imperatore Haile Selassie. L’Eritrean People’s Liberation Front riuscì, infine – anche grazie all’aiuto indiretto di altri gruppi di opposizione alla giunta militare etiopica, come il Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) e l’Oromo Liberation Front (OLF) – a liberare la città di Asmara, e così l’Eritrea, il 24 maggio 1991. Dopo la caduta del Dergue nel giugno del 1991, la coalizione che aveva contribuito alla sua sconfitta, l’Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), prese il potere in Etiopia, dichiarando un periodo di transizione di due anni prima di indire un referendum sull’indipendenza eritrea. Nell’aprile del 1993 gli eritrei si espressero in favore dell’indipendenza, e così nel maggio dello stesso anno l’EPLF dichiarò il paese come uno Stato indipendente, il quale nasceva dai medesimi confini ereditati dall’ex colonia italiana. La configurazione dell’Eritrea nello scacchiere internazionale e regionale ha evidenziato come i suoi confini siano stati discussi e modellati nel tempo da forze prettamente “esterne”. Il paese pertanto può essere descritto come una classica "Borderland", a territorial entity always placed in open conflict with its important neighbors such as the state of Ethiopia, the Sudan and the Arab overlooking the Red Sea.

The ideological basis for the political development of post-Eritrean war of liberation were then transcribed in the National Charter for Eritrea, adopted by the Third Congress dell'EPLF / PFDJ in February 1994.
It was during this congress, the Front decided to change its name to People Front for Democracy and Justice (PFDJ), with the intent to emphasize the conclusion of the liberation war and the transition from one wing of the administration militare ad una civile.
Una delle prime misure prese dal PFDJ per rafforzare il senso di appartenenza nazionale fu proprio quella di imbastire una leva militare obbligatoria per tutti gli uomini e donne che avessero raggiunto almeno un’età di diciotto anni. Unendo così in un unico esercito giovani Kunama, Afar, Beni Amer e Tigrini, il nuovo governo cercava di accrescere e cementificare lo stesso spirito nazionalista sperimentato durante gli anni di lotta di liberazione.

Quando l’Eritrea raggiunse l’indipendenza formale nel 1993, il proprio confine con l’Etiopia era ancora fissato da una serie di trattati coloniali italo-etiopici (segnati nel 1900, 1902 e 1908). Nonostante questo, the border was never fully demarcated, causing many problems to the usufruct of land and disputes in a number of administrative villages. On May 6, 1998, a small group of Eritrean soldiers entered the disputed area near the village of Badme, which still was under Ethiopian administration since 1962. The small and limited in comparison to the fire that ensued caused the escalation of the tension the more extensive, which led to the outbreak of a genuine cross-border war. Following the bombing on the Ethiopian city of Massawa, Asmara and Assab, the country accepted a peace document drawn up by the then Organization of African Unity (OAU). So, in August 1999 both parties to the conflict agreed in principle to the mediation of the OAU, which led - after a massive Ethiopian offensive in May 2000 - Algiers Agreement, signed June 18, 2000. The agreement provided for the establishment of a buffer zone along the Eritrean-Ethiopian border about 25 miles wide and called Temporary Security Zone (TSZ). The entire security strip was located entirely in Eritrean territory and led to the origin some 4,000 UN peacekeepers, members of the UNMEE (United Nations Mission for Eritrea and Ethiopia).

The Algiers Treaty was finally ratified by the Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi and President Eritrea Isaias Afwerki in December 2000. In addition, approval of the plan of peace inaugurated two committees, which would have to first register and regulate the claims of the two contenders (EECMA - Eritrea and Ethiopia Claim Commission) and the other to ensure the implementation of the demarcation of the border ( EEBC - Eritrea and Ethiopia Boundary Commission). The Boundary Commission, according to its founding treaty, had the task of providing a demarcation on the basis of several colonial treaties (treaties between Italy and Ethiopia in 1900, 1902 and 1908). The court therefore had no powers to impose such decisions on the matter ex aequo et bono. In particular, its membri erano privi della facoltà di esprimere giudizi basati su principi di equità ma, al contrario, le proprie funzioni dovevano esclusivamente attenersi ai testi dei trattati istituiti in epoca coloniale. La decisione della commissione si concretizzò quindi nel marzo del 2003, sancendo – di fatto – il diritto di appartenenza eritrea sul villaggio di Badme. Il rifiuto etiopico della decisione dell’EEBC determinò, però, uno stallo nelle trattative sul confine, di cui ancora oggi non se ne riesce a vedere una soluzione.

La nuova escalation di tensione legata al contenzioso sul confine è stata inoltre accompagnata – tra il maggio 2005 ed il luglio del 2006 – dall’espulsione dei European peacekeepers, American and Russian Eritrea and a significant reduction in the quota UNMEE, which now has about 2,500 men (of which 230 observers), as defined by Resolution 1681 of 31 May 2006. Despite numerous reminders of the UN Security Council to the spirit of Algiers - also accompanied by real threats of sanctions - both parties still refuse to sit at the negotiating table again, sacrificing diplomatic action in favor of a new - but not unprecedented - "relocation" of the conflict. This trend was also witnessed the entry of the two countries in the intricate crises in Somalia, which saw the alignment of at least two distinct fronts, who now believe that opposing the one hand the Transitional Federal Institutions based in Baidoa and Mogadishu - politically and militarily supported and protected by the Zenawi government - the Alliance and other for the Liberation of Somalia (ALS), born in September 2007 in Asmara under the protective umbrella of the government Afwerki.
The Alliance for the Liberation of Somalia (ALS) is a movement of opposition to the Transitional Federal Government was born in September 2007 in Asmara. It includes some 400 delegates, including the former chairman of the Shura Islamic Courts Union Hassan Dahir Aweys, the former Chairman of the Executive Board of the Courts Sharif Sheikh Ahmad, the former president of the transitional parliament Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden and the former deputy prime minister of the Transitional Federal Government Hussein Mohamed Farah Aidid.

Currently, Eritrea is ruled by a one-party system (People Front for Democracy and Justice - PFDJ), where there is no political opposition and where the field of information is held firmly in the hands of the executive through the Ministry of Information. The economy and its productive forces have been fully nationalized. The country therefore - also in accordance with the view of many analysts - is in many ways a classic example of "developmental state". In fact, its current system of governance has two main features: an ideological and a more structural. The structural component is the fact that political power bases its legitimacy primarily in its ability to promote and support development from within, minimizing the flow of international aid (which also explains the difficulty of non-governmental organizations to work and promote projects development in the country). On the ideological level, however, the ruling elite must be able at any time to impose "ideological hegemony" on society. In other words, the year that marked the work of the Asmara government seem to be largely the result of a process of state-building managed distinctly "top down" political elite in power. It also does nothing but present significantly in contrast with the spirit of the years of liberation struggle and then experienced the kind of accountability, the fact of inclusion and grassroots participation, particularly among the rural population of the plateau.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

How To Make A Bicycle Cake

Militarized Diplomacy: foreign policy ERITREA between continuity and discontinuity (Part I) Eritrea




This article il frutto delle riflessioni e degli interventi scaturiti da una conferenza organizzata dal centro di ricerca di politica internazionale Chatham House di Londra il 17 dicembre 2007 e dal titolo “Eritrea’s Regional Role and Foreign Policy: Past, Present and Future Perspectives"


LIMES, RIVISTA ITALIANA DI GEOPOLITICA
di Matteo Guglielmo
pubblicato il 26/2/2008 su http://www.limesonline.com





I rapporti politici tra Etiopia ed Eritrea sembrano essere nuovamente degenerati. I venti di guerra si avvicinano, mentre si respira la medesima atmosfera che precedette the last confrontation of the war 1998-2000. Major international research centers such as the International Crisis Group and the Chatham House, agree the situation to an end. The political motivations of this new escalation which could threaten to drag other countries in the Horn of Africa, Somalia in the head.


"The history of the regional borders of Eritrea does not go back more than a hundred years. All Eritreans are born equal. No ethnic group is superior or inferior to others. Eritrea belongs equally to every Eritrean. The new government therefore will fight forever against any divisive forces to create regional and religious conflicts in the country. "
Extract from speech of President Isaias Afwerki during the inauguration of the new regional administrative divisions of the country (Zoba) in 1995.



A Smara, August 20 2007. Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki is preparing to release a long and full interview on national television ERITV concerning the state of relations with Washington. For two years now, in fact,
ties with the United States appear to be significantly impaired. The Isaias positions in foreign policy - sometimes unscrupulous - have often left stunned not only most of Western diplomacy, but the same U.S. administration, which - through its special envoy Jendayi Frazer - has just occurred on the role of Eritrea in the Somali crisis, defining "dangerous terrorists" some members of the deposed Islamic Courts in Mogadishu that is now in Asmara, and so accusing Eritrea of \u200b\u200bsupporting and supporting international terrorism in the Horn of Africa.

the allegations of the Secretary of the State Department in recent months has promptly responded to the Eritrean Information Minister Ali Abdu, who now described as "unjustified" action by the Frazer, emphasizing not only the commitment of country against the international terrorism of Islamic origin, but fighting back to the words of the Secretary determine the position of Washington "arrogant and time to carry out a political pressure on the Eritrean government". Although diplomacy remains largely a matter of Asmara to read, especially in the short term, the exchange of words between Eritrea and the Bush administration stresses the important role that the country currently holds the balance of power in the Horn , also reveals a certain impatience with the base "discriminatory" project of regional balance etiopicostatunitense. This, indeed, in the words of the president himself Afwerki, sarebbe diretto più che altro alla subordinazione delle numerose “periferie” della regione; dalla Somalia all’Ogaden, dall’Eritrea al Darfur.

L’Eritrea ha certamente dimostrato un ottimo grado d’institution-building a seguito della sua vittoria militare per l’indipendenza, contro un’Etiopia dapprima appoggiata dagli Stati Uniti (1953-1977), e successivamente sostenuta – durante buona parte del periodo di governo del Dergue – dall’Unione Sovietica (1977-1991). Il paese, negli ultimi quindici anni, è riuscito a legittimare il proprio status di nuovo attore della comunità internazionale a seguito di un referendum vinto dalle forze indipendentiste con quasi il 98,5% dei voti, e dove si espressero il 99,8% degli aventi diritto. La leadership politica, che dopo il 1993 ha guidato il paese attraverso la transizione delle istituzioni da movimento di guerriglia ad amministrazione di stampo civile, si è presentata però profondamente divisa, soprattutto in merito al modello di governance da adottare. In seguito, infatti, prevalse all’interno dell’esecutivo una linea politica certamente più pragmatica, ma drammaticamente antidemocratica, principalmente a causa dei numerosi contenziosi legati ai confini che hanno visto l’Eritrea contrapporsi ai suoi importanti vicini per buona parte della seconda metà degli anni Novanta, fino allo scoppio della guerra di frontiera with Ethiopia in 1998. This conflict, in particular, seems to have dragged the country into a vortex of military mobilization and political repression unprecedented, who ended up seriously compromising the prospects for democratization. The situation has further deteriorated in 2006, with the increase in custodial measures against a number of political dissidents, accompanied by strong restrictions on NGOs and international aid agencies in the area. Eritrea's independence, achieved after nearly three decades of guerrilla warfare, carried out first and then dall'Eritrean dall'Eritrean Liberation Front People's Liberation Front (EPLF), led to a strong concentration of political power, now held firmly in the hands of leadership of the former military commander - and current president - Isaias Afwerki. The constitution, ratified in 1997 has not yet been implemented, and elections have been postponed indefinitely. The

Eritrea lives in a perpetual state of emergency, and the constant state of tension with Ethiopia not only dominates all political discourse, but seems to serve the scheme as a means of mobilization and militarization inside.



Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Rogers High Speed Lite And Skype

a nation held hostage (Part Two) Eritrea

by http://www.a24media.com/




Brown Cervical Mucus Before Period

a nation held hostage (Part One)

by http://www.a24media.com/




Saturday, October 24, 2009

Price To Rent Bowling Shoes At Amf

Hercules and the Augean stables.





Dittatura, multinazionali e società civile.
Spesso sento parlare di paesi africani dove si consumano tragedie e che in Africa la sofferenza e il dolore sono il corso normale degli eventi. L'Eritrea è un paese africano, ma perchè deve seguire il sentiero della guerra civile, delle dittature, della fame, dell'esodo della popolazione?
Anche a me inquetano le risposte del tipo :"in Africa le cose funzionano così!".
La realtà è che la società civile africana che permette che succeda tutto questo.

Gli organi di informazioni occidentali definisco l'Eritrea come paese del Terzo Mondo o meglio "paese in via di sviluppo". La società civile eritrea, si è mai chiesta cosa significa essere un "paese in via di Sviluppo"? E 'in developing the country's government? Politics and the parties are in the developing world? The administration? Education? The media are in the developing world? Eritrea has had the opportunity to develop?
For example, consider the reconstruction of Italy since 1945? In 20 years after the Second World War had reached its economic boom and everyone had forgotten about the second world war. So why the almost 18 years since independence in Eritrea continues to wage war, to deal with its neighbors and violate the human rights of their people?
Some may say it is the fault of the war against Ethiopia. Then we compare Eritrea with Israel. This country from his controversial birth has addressed almost all the wars with neighboring Arab countries.
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflitti_arabo-israeliani
The war with Egypt in 1956
The Six-Day War of 1967
The Yom Kippur War (Yom Kippur)
In 1978, the invasion of the south Lebanon
Intifada
etc ... etc ...
say that Israel as the Eritrean women also enlisted in the army. The civil service takes so much effort and time to young Israelis. It 'a state of emergency in perennial conflict. But the Israelis can vote for the party they want, the judiciary can check the actions of the military, politics and the police. The rights of the Israeli town of inte are carefully followed.



So what's missing from Eritrea to Israel? I might venture to say that there's no "COMPANY 'CIVIL' of developed countries.
E 'Eritrean civil society that is backward. In Eritrea informed, get involved in politics and actively aware of it, to the institutions to account for their actions is a crime equivalent to high treason against the state. Subversion of democracy (If you really need to talk to democratic order.)
not that there is no information, because many crimes of the Eritrean government are now on the lips of everyone, including the Eritrean dictator himself.


Sometimes it happens that I come across discussions in which the enemy is the African neo-colonialism. Where the fault of African disasters you download to Western countries (and in part to China). Who allows multinational companies to do business in Africa? I'm just the shareholders or are African governments?
If the neo-colonialism was a crime to wear in court, then the part of African civil society that hold? Defendant, prosecutor or defense attorney? Civil society at the moment is the role of the defense lawyer, put forward the strategy of silence, the right not to respond (to violations of the interests of the country). Civil society said nothing provides the pretext for the continuation of business of corporations in the land Africa. Silence is consent. Now there are not only the multinationals but there are also departments and military commands. See the U.S. presence with Africom.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRCZk8mM1EU
Who provides support to military bases? The land where the win? Or agree that dictatorships are the same? African civil society what it does in this case?


Returning to Eritrea:
The problem lies in the work of companies that let pass any action getting used to everything, then nothing will amaze, frighten or sorrow. Everyone, including Isayas Afeworky are Conscious of how dramatic the situation of the Eritrean people.
Maybe it's time to stop a moment and think like out of this quagmire.

To make me understand I want to tell a mythological story that I read last week in a newspaper.

Heracles is a hero of Greek mythology, Roman mythology, corresponding to the figure of Hercules. Famous are his incredible feats, the twelve labors. In particular, the present episode of the Augean stables.

Augean dell'Elide was the king, in the Peloponnese;
Augean had received from his father Elio lot cattle. Augean stables never not cleaned, so that it continued to accumulate manure created serious problems in the area, while the sky was obscured by swarms of flies attracted by the dirt. Hercules proposed to King that Augean would clean up the dung from his vast stables before sundown. In exchange, he asked for a tenth of all his cattle. The king accepted the bet and the two incredulous swore on their agreement. Heracles then opened two breaches in the walls of the stables, and diverted the course of the nearby rivers and the rushing waters invaded the huge stables and courtyards, sweeping away the dung to the valleys of the pasture. So Heracles made his "sixth effort" cleaning up the entire earth dell'Elide without even getting dirty.

a Swiss writer Friedrich Dürrenmatt. Switzerland is the country where the choices are made with the referendum is the people to govern themselves. Participatory democracy.
Friedrich Durrenmatt wrote in 1954 a story titled "Hercules and the Augean stables" (Herkules und der Stall des Augias). In the sixth review of fatigue that makes Durrenmatt but not Hercules cleaning the Augean stables, but they are citizens to do so. The moral is that it is not the hero but the people dell'Elide clean up the dirt on his country. Citizens will have a clean and orderly country only if they do not delegate to any management and policy, but if they take charge in person. Why democracy, government by the people, is growing thanks to continuous and diligent monitoring and cleanup actions.


Eritrean We expect the heroes (or other Western countries) that will release us from the chains of dictatorship. Maybe it's time that we have to inform us in person and costruici a review, and then maybe look for solutions for this country.

Before concluding I want to connect the mythology and neo-colonialism by using the end of the story of Heracles.

Heracles at the end after you have cleaned the stables Augean asked the king the promised reward, but he refused saying that he was deceived by him: not Hercules but the rivers were cleaned up by the dung of his kingdom. Heracles asked that the dispute be referred for trial but was to his detriment and was expelled from the Elide.
According to another version, the dispute that followed the failure to reward for their work led to the war: Hercules and Augean won was killed.

Multinationals can compare with the Hercules, which provide their services to an African country. The relationship between multinationals and neo-colonies as so often end tragically, as described in the story of the Augean stables, just because the government is at odds with the interests of the companies. I would not be
franinteso, multinationals and governments have the right to do business with who they want. The issue is that dictatorships are not an expression of the people and often do not meet these dictatorships nor a monitoring body, nor to the judiciary. So problems of dictatorship and multinationals lead to trouble not only to destabilize a country but a whole region of a continent. All this is because civil society has abdicated its role as guarantor and controller.



Sunday, October 18, 2009

Pittsburgh Coach Looks Like Foreman

Manifesto





http://asmarino.com/ by 18 October 2009
Before the G15, the G13
There Were "The Berlin Manifesto"
Letter to the President of Eritrea.







Berlin, October 3, 2000

HE Isaias Afwerki
President of the State of Eritrea
Asmara, ERITREA

Dear Mr. President:


We, the undersigned, Eritrean academics and professionals, concerned with the predicament facing our country, have agreed to meet in order to make a sober appraisal of our country’s current problems and to suggest appropriate solutions. Fully cognizant of your role in leading our nation to independence and mindful of your continued importance as a national leader, we decided to address this letter for your consideration and action.

Your comrades-in-arms trusted you as their leader during the liberation struggle. Your assumption of the office of President is a function of that trust. That trust and the responsibilities that it implies have never been more important than at this crucial moment of our history. We, as concerned Eritreans, also feel the weight of this responsibility. It is for this reason that we have come together to voice our concerns, and to exchange views and ideas which we submit as follows.

We would like to begin by expressing our unreserved support for our government in its defense of our country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and our admiration for the Eritrean defense forces and the entire Eritrean population for their role in foiling the Ethiopian aggression. But it is our firm belief that the military threat posed by Ethiopia cannot be dealt with separately from the political and economic challenges that confront us as a new nation. We are aware that the great promise of peaceful reconstruction and development has been shelved by considerations of national survival. However, we are also convinced that we can meet the present danger and future challenges if we unite our efforts and correct our past mistakes. The current crisis presents an opportunity to those ends.

I. A Hard-Won Independence Was Nearly Lost

Mr. President,

The experience of the last two years has been particularly painful but enlightening. As a nation we have been devastated by the Ethiopian invasion of our sovereign land. Indeed, the wound inflicted upon us by this war has been a chastening experience. Destroying towns and driving thousands of innocent citizens from their homes and even to foreign lands, the Ethiopian army’s deep penetration inside Eritrea and our sudden retreats shocked every Eritrean to the core and shook our nation to its very foundation. The very independence and sovereignty for which Eritreans paid with their lives and limbs was put at risk. We believe, had it not been for the resistance waged by our heroic defense forces and the unflinching support of our people, Eritrea would have almost been destroyed..

How did this come to pass? What are the causes of this tragic war? Why and how did the Ethiopians manage to penetrate deep into Eritrean territory with such speed and devastating effect? This war has not only cost us dear in life, property and in the suffering of our people. It has also raised grave questions about the conduct of Eritrean affairs both domestic and foreign, and about the nature and style of our leadership in the post-independence period.

Mr. President,

To ask why we have come to this impasse to inquire into what went wrong and to reflect upon the cause and conduct of the war, and whether it might have been avoided, is not only legitimate, but it is also the duty of every citizen. We hope that the Eritrean leadership, in its recent meetings, has done some soul searching and endeavored to provide satisfactory answers to these questions. We, on our part, took it upon ourselves, as concerned citizens who made modest contributions to our national struggle, to express our views on our nation’s current predicament and to offer some proposals as remedies. We hope and trust that you will consider these views in the spirit in which they are given, i.e., on the strength of our patriotic duties and our peoples proud tradition of love of truth and respect for the opinion of others.

The initial impulse that brought us together is manifold. First and foremost, it is the humanitarian crisis facing our people as a result of the war with Ethiopia. But we would be remiss, as concerned citizens, were we to ignore the other burning issues exposed by the current crisis facing our nation --political, social, and economic, as well as crisis in leadership.

II. Humanitarian Crisis and Eritreas Image

On the humanitarian question, we express deep concern for the tragic conditions of Eritrean victims of war. We are particularly concerned with the plight of the hundreds of thousands of Eritreans who have been affected by the war and the over 75,000 compatriots who were expelled from Ethiopia, and our citizens who are in refugee camps in the Sudan as well as those still languishing in Ethiopian jails and concentration camps. While we appreciate the Eritrean governments principled stand on the issue of deportation, we hope and trust that any deportation that may take place in Eritrea, if necessary and legitimate, would adhere to international law, and be in accordance with the previous practice of the Eritrean government.

We support the Eritrean National Assembly’s recent resolution condemning the criminal acts of the Ethiopian government, and we condemn the many egregious acts of violence, vandalism, rape and theft that have been perpetrated, and are being perpetrated, by agents of the said government against innocent Eritreans, In this respect, we pledge to commit our intellectual and financial resources in the ongoing effort to mobilize support. We trust the government to facilitate the timely delivery of humanitarian aid to our people in this time of need and we call upon every citizen to lend a helping hand in this effort.

Turning to another issue of concern, i.e., Eritrea’s image, we wish to assure you, on the basis of close observation, that Eritrea’s image has never been as bad as it is today. Indeed, it has hit rock bottom. There should be no illusions about this. Despite our belief in the rightness of our position, much of the world community, including our fellow Africans, perceive the Eritrean government and its leadership as aggressive and irresponsible. Eritrea’s leadership has been cast, particularly since the start of the war with Ethiopia, as contemptuous of international law and accepted norms of behavior.

Although Eritrea’s worsening image may have been affected by these charges, it is also true that we have alienated our friends and allies, including those who stood by us during the liberation struggle. Even the commendable policy of self-reliance, which many applauded, has now been portrayed as an aspect of arrogance. In our view, the problem is not the policy but its implementation. We know that there is a lot of room for improvement in the matter of implementing policies and in the manner of handling representatives of foreign bodies. Hence, there needs to be a critical reappraisal of policy and praxis.

III. The War and Critical Issues it Brought to Light.

We have followed with great interest and anxiety the unfolding of events since the outbreak of the war with Ethiopia. This tragic war has induced in us a need for critical review of the post-independence developments in Eritrea and particularly in our government’s performance. We recognize the fact that there are notable achievements in the fields of infrastructure, education, and social services. However, we have also noted developments that cause us considerable uneasiness and serious concerns about the future of our country.

Despite these disquieting developments, we remained remarkably silent. The reason for our silence was not due to apathy or lack of interest but rather due to the pervasive phenomenon of self-censorship. This self-censorship was particularly acute during the last two years because we all felt that criticism would give aid and comfort to the enemy who might distort it to suit its purposes. Now it is time to speak and speak plainly. Further silence can only endanger the interest of the country as well as compromise our historic responsibility. We must now say that, in our considered opinion, the government has lagged behind in the development of democratic institutions, including mechanisms for ensuring accountability and transparency. We respectfully submit that this is the most important matter for you to ponder and face squarely in whatever reappraisal of government policy and practice you may be undertaking, as we hope you are.

IV. Reconciliation and National Unity

We are convinced that we reflect a widely held view among Eritreans that there should be national reconciliation. Eritrean military victory and the assumption of sovereign nationhood should have been accompanied by a spirit of reconciliation fired by magnanimity the same magnanimity shown towards Ethiopians. Wisdom and statesmanship required a call for reconciliation extended to all Eritreans irrespective of belief or political affiliation to join hands in rebuilding a shattered society and economy. It is an opportunity that was lost but that can still he reclaimed. The EPLF (PFDJ) leadership should be willing now to provide political space for groups or individuals. The absence of such space has severely affected the development of civil society and has fostered a feeling of alienation among segments of our society. The constitution, about which we shall say more below, requires such space in no uncertain terms.

V. Collective Leadership and Popular Participation

Mr. President,

Considering the practice of the EPLF during the armed struggle, we believe that one of the grave mistakes that the government has made has been the abandonment of collective leadership. You do not need us to tell you that the practice had created trust and mutual confidence among the leadership and between the leadership and the rank and file. The heroic struggle of Eritrean fighters their tenacity and resilience in the face of overwhelming odds would not have been successful without such trust and confidence and the collective leadership based on it.

After independence this practice was abandoned and replaced by one-man leadership. It is also distressing to learn that individuals who were part of the leadership during the struggle have been inexplicably sidelined, in some cases with a loss of their use in this crucial time of crisis. This is inexcusable, and whatever the explanation for this negative development, we feel that it must be rectified. No individual leader, however gifted, can he a substitute for values that come with collective reflection and action in national affairs. The advent of one-man dominance has had the effect of suffocating a variety of ideas from blossoming and denied meaningful popular participation. It has inevitably prevented the growth of democratic institutions. A new nation with very limited and under-developed resources facing enormous challenges in all fields’ political, security, economic, social cannot afford to have a government that depends only on one person.

In fairness, the blame must also be shared by other members of the leadership to the extent that they did not object to the negative practices. They may have put up some feeble complaints, but we have heard of no such protests. So, they too have failed the nation along with you in allowing power to be concentrated in the hands of one man. The absence of any record of protest is also a function of the absence of freedom of expression which has prevented the citizens from exercising their rightful duty of restraining the undue accumulation of power in the presidency. Thus it is no exaggeration to say that, despite some notable progress to its name, the government has failed the nation in some important respect.

VI. Crisis within the Leadership

Mr. President,

It is not a secret that there is a serious contradiction and a major rift among the leadership. We cannot over-emphasize our apprehension of what may ensue. We deem it to be too serious and dangerous to he handled in a confrontational manner. Hence, we appeal to you and the rest of the leadership to handle it carefully, and to resolve all future conflicts within the framework envisaged by the constitution. Any further delay in resolving the crisis within the leadership will have grave consequences for our nation. We cannot minimize the potential weakness that this crisis may create if not handled properly, considering the opportunity that it can give the enemy to exploit our internal contradictions.

VII. The Role of PFDJ in Politics and the Economy

Mr. President,

We are particularly concerned about the parallel institutions of the PFDJ and the government. We see lack of clarity in functions. We see duplication and a bewildering variety of tasks and actors. We feel this involves confusion and waste of resources which a small nation with scarce resources can ill afford.

We would like to see a clear definition of what the PFDJ is. We would also like to see it confined to party activities and refrain from activities that are the proper province of government. The PFDJs economic activities are a cause for concern and an abuse of the goodwill and trust of the people. While it cannot be denied that PFDJ/government business activities have solved many problems by providing timely and affordable commodities to our people, this cannot he said anymore. In point of fact, PFDJ/government economic activities are contrary to the government’s policy of "a dynamic, private sector-led . . .market economy.. .and a commitment to private sector development... More to the point, PFDJ companies have no clear mechanism of accountability and transparency. At least, there is none that is known to the public. We believe that this is a recipe for disaster and for fostering corruption, cronyism, and favoritism. This climate discourages genuine and credible investors. We strongly believe that the current business practices of the PFDJ will act as corrosive agent of the political, social, and economic life of the nation, in any ease, and in view of the record of the PFDJ, it is important to seriously reassess the whole question of a party running business.

VIII. Implementation of the Constitution

Eritrea has a constitution the most sacred document of the nation. This constitution represents the consummation of the Eritrean struggle which was fought for self-determination, democracy, social justice and the rule of law. It was crafted with the participation of the people and was ratified by their representatives. It is the people’s document and no one has the right to suspend it or otherwise tamper with it. You were right when you said in your recent interview that the time for the implementation of the constitution was yesterday. [Iwanu ttnallyu neiru.] We agree, but we say: better late than never,

The constitution must be implemented immediately. A ratified constitution means that it is already in effect and that the Eritrean people should be enjoying their constitutional rights. We are dismayed to witness the operation of institutions that are clearly and flagrantly in violation of the spirit and letter of the constitution. We are astounded to hear of practices that are contrary to the provisions of the constitution continue today. We, therefore, solemnly request that you take the necessary steps to ensure the fill and immediate implementation of our constitution.

As a sign of goodwill and seriousness of intent, again, we would like you to abolish the special court which is undermining the rule of law and creating disaffection among a segment of our population. People have been languishing in jail for many years without being formally charged of any crime, let alone sentenced. They have been waiting to appear before the special court. This stands in stark opposition to the letter and spirit of the constitution and is an affront to elementary notions of justice. We urge you to set these people free immediately or have them brought before a court of law.

Another disturbing practice that is contrary to the spirit of the rule of law is the resort to arbitrary practices of freezing civil servants in what is popularly known as midiskal. This harsh and unfair practice, presumably intended to instill fear, seems to have been self-defeating. If the intent was to correct or rehabilitate the victim, or otherwise bring something good to government or the nation, it has not had that effect. The overall effect of the practice has been disillusionment, confusion and waste of valuable resources.

Conclusion

Mr. President,

Eritrea is at a crossroad. A portion of our land is under foreign occupation. A significant proportion of our population is displaced. It is time for a serious soul searching by all concerned, starting from the leadership. Let the leadership and the entire nation conduct an open debate. People should not be denied this right which they have paid for with their blood, sweat and tears. We urge you most sincerely to seize this moment of crisis and turn it into an opportunity to reclaim your hard-earned reputation as a leader. You owe it to yourself and to the nation and to wonderful people that has followed you through thick and thin.

On our side, we will spare no effort to help secure Eritrea’s territorial integrity and national sovereignty. At the same time, we will endeavor to promote a culture of openness, tolerance, accountability and rule of law. To these ends, we intend to broaden our base by convening a larger meeting which will consider your response to this letter. The idea is to begin and institutionalize a government/civil society dialogue on a continuing basis as a critical part of a healthy development of our future.

Respectfully Yours,
1. Araya Debessay
2. Assefaw Tekeste
3. Bereket Habte Selassie
4. Dawit Mesfin
5. Haile Debas
6. Kassahun Checole
7. Kaled A. Beshir
8. Lula Ghebreyesus
9. Miriam M. Omar
10. Mohamed Kheir Omar
11. Mussie Misghina
12. Paulos Tesfagiorgis
13. Reesom Haile

Contact person in Asmara Paulos Tesfagiorgis


And finally to President Issayas Afewerki,

“Is there no respect of place, persons, nor time in you? “

(William Shakespeare)

(1564-1616), British dramatist, poet. Malvolio, in Twelfth Night, act 2, sc. 3, l. 91-2. Reprimanding Sir Toby and his companions for their rowdiness at night.)